Home Chameleon November 09

November Archives

Mulatto, is it socially acceptable?

E-mail Print PDF
Mulatto, we all know what it means. If you're not big on multiracial issues, then I suppose I can give you the Merriam-Webster definition and etymology:

Function:
noun
Inflected Form(s):
plural mu·lat·toes or mu·lat·tos
Etymology:
Spanish mulato, from mulo mule, from Latin mulus
Date:
1593

1 : the first-generation offspring of a black person and a white person \
2 : a person of mixed white and black ancestry

As to be expected, Webster only reports the terms meaning (Duh, it's a dictionary). So, in order to get a broader and more clearer picture of the word we will have to dig in deeper. As the title suggests, let us derive how this word may even be considered offensive to some today by starting with the etymology of mulatto.

The Spanish interpretation of the word mulato is derived from mulo/mule. This mule, produced from a male donkey (62 chromosomes) and a female horse (64 chromosomes) has 63 chromosomes. This resulting number of chromosomes inhibits sterility in mules over 99.99% of the time (there have been a few documented cases of sterile female mules).

Back during times of slavery many people operated around the paradigm that black people and white people were different species to say the least. Thus, when a mulatto was born it was believed to be sterile, much unlike mules. It is hard for one to believe that people actually believed in this phenomenon, but believe it or not this was a dominant perspective at the time. Of course mulatto's would go on to produce healthy and normal children with white, black, and other mulatto people, thereby contradicting such notions. So one must ask, was  such negativity used as a constant reminder that these children spawned from two diametric forces, such that the difference in white and black people would effectively make mulatto's too different to be accepted anywhere? Better yet, did bad habits just die hard?

Last Updated ( Sunday, 06 December 2009 23:27 )
 

Racism and Stereotyping in Today’s Films and Comedy

E-mail Print PDF

In the last century, we have seen a progressive climb out of the reaches of racist antics in our entertainment industry. However, like with every nation, there still exists racial discrimination and the constant ethnic stereotyping in many fields of entertainment, especially in comedy. This is something that will seemingly never go away but as an audience, how do we feel about the constant ethnic stereotyping in films, stand-ups, etc.? Are we still as sensitive as the past about what’s being said or are we getting closer to the point where we’re able to sit back and laugh at ourselves? Are these artists simply belittling other cultures or are they purposely trying to ease the tension on the barriers by showing that if we’re able to laugh, then we’re able to see past the hate? Or are we only making matters worse by making ourselves the butt of the joke?

There is no question that many of us find a bit of fun and pleasure when it comes to comedians and actors poking fun at specific ethnic groups, especially when they’re poking fun at the groups that they themselves are apart of. Fellow comedians and actors Bobby Lee (Mad TV), Russell Peters (Indian Canadian stand-up comedian), Dave Chapelle (Chapelle Show) and John Leguizamo (Summer of Sam, Freak!) are some relatively well-known members of the American entertainment industry who have thrived on making people laugh with racial/ethnic discriminatory material--whether light or heavy. Russell Peters is an emerging comedic artist who pours the ideas of multiculturalism into his work--when he’s making fun of his Indian ancestry or the accents of Jamaicans and the Chinese. Dave Chapelle, John Leguizamo and Bobby Lee are artists who mainly like make fun of their own racial/ethnic background with depictions of ethnic stereotypes as well.

Last Updated ( Friday, 04 December 2009 19:38 )
 

Dr. King, How Far Have We Come?

E-mail Print PDF
On the third Monday of January each year, we commemorate a true pacifist who chose to stand up against the status quo and fight for the greater good for all Americans during a time when speaking out against racial injustices could and did have severe consequences. This man, who endured jail time, oral protests and physical abuse, was one of the most prominent leaders of the Civil Rights Movement. This great man that I speak of is Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. His first public demonstration of protest for racial discrimination was the organization of the Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955. This was the catalyst for his humanitarian efforts.

Dr. King's efforts to end racial segregation and discrimination through civil disobedience such as sit-ins and other non-violent means rewarded him by becoming the youngest person to have received the Nobel Peace Prize. Now, the thing that makes this year's celebration of Dr. King's accomplishments even more memorable is that it transitions right into January 20th, the date every newly elected president will be inaugurated. As we all know, this year our first non-white president, Barack Obama, will be sworn into office. So, while we exude joy for this historic inauguration and remember the life of Dr. King, let's take a look back at some of Dr. King's famous words. An excerpt from his I Have a Dream speech, reveals some of the things he hoped to one day see:

"I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal."

I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.

I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.

Last Updated ( Friday, 04 December 2009 19:42 )
 

Avatar: The Last Insult

E-mail Print PDF

If you thought the recasting of characters from the film “21” from Asian to white was an insult to the Asian community, you’ve only scratched the surface of the injustices they’ve faced through mass media. The latest atrocity comes from the casting for the “The Last Airbender,” the Avatar live action movie.

For those of you who may not be familiar, “Avatar: The Last Airbender” was a very successful, Emmy Award-winning, American animated television series that aired for three seasons on Nickelodeon set in a world based entirely on Asian (primarily East, South Asia, and Inuit) cultures, values, and not just martial arts. Avatar features the clothing, food, and philosophies among many other aspects of Asian culture and the Inuit, as well as strong themes of multiculturalism and diversity among the Asian continent.

The actions of the production team and the studio perpetuate the concept that Asian Americans don't matter in American society and reinforce concepts of white privilege, cultural appropriation, and white washing. To cast white actors and deny Asian Americans (or any minorities for that matter) a chance at major roles in a big movie is a crime against the art, the creators, and not just Asian Americans but any minority that's ever been denied a role to a white person in fear of a production not appealing to the "mass audience."

Many will be quick to blame the director for this decision. However, I am not holding M. Night Shyamalan completely responsible for this, because I understand there are many influences in the creative process when it comes to mass media. Yes, he is one of three producers on this project, but the producer still has to answer to the studio, and in this case, his fellow producers, but casting is typically done by a casting director, which a director should have say over. Unfortunately, the processes and conflicts in making a movie are quite complex with all these chains of command to answer to: above the director, you have the producer, the production company, and if applicable, the studio, in ascending order. The studio in turn, has to answer to the parent company, if it is a subsidiary, and the parent company has to answer to the shareholders, if a public company, so things can get messy real quick in this business.

Sure, he could have chosen to walk off the project, but it would probably still get made. He could even fight them over this, but I have little reason to believe he did and fought valiantly. Perhaps what disappoints me most is that Shyamalan is a member of the Asian community. He is Indian.

Last Updated ( Sunday, 06 December 2009 15:59 )